The Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State
Council earlier this month issued a document called "Opinions On
Deepening Reforms of the Cultural System."
Reforms of the sector, which have already been underway on an
experimental basis, will now be in full swing as the country's top
policy makers have clearly stated the strategy in transforming the
sector.
It is great news for the cultural sector itself. The move also
has political and economic implications.
A successful reform of the sector will bring a more lively,
colourful life for the Chinese people.
The government's resolve to move further will also mean new
opportunities for investors and exporters of Chinese cultural
products, and a premium for gross domestic product.
The move to reform the cultural sector is primarily a response
to Chinese people's surging demand for cultural products.
As Chinese people enjoy increasing material wealth generated by
the country's economic growth, they naturally need more
entertainment and spiritual nourishments, which are provided by a
more thriving cultural sector.
The building of a more vibrant cultural sector is part of the
nation's strategy to construct a prosperous society in all
aspects.
A thriving cultural scene will offer people living in this
country more access to cultural facilities, which would make our
traditional and modern culture more understandable.
The majority of the document stipulated measures to foster
cultural businesses.
Culture has long been seen in this country as a sector that
should be independent from commercial interests.
The document indicated that the country's leaders have
recognized cultural sector's huge overlap with the economic
sector.
Support of commercial schemes in the cultural sector would help
solve the problem of fund shortage, which used to be a key
hindrance for its development.
In return, cultural businesses would also generate a new area
for economic growth.
Benefits from cultural product export are recognized by an
increasing number of countries. While earning money, cultural
products would, of course, also help promote culture of the
products' country of origin.
China has produced quite a few commercially successful artists
on the international stage. Still, it does not have cultural
industry companies capable of competing globally.
Now the document pin-pointedly says that cultural enterprises
should go global.
Time would be needed before the goal being met. But the strategy
is undoubtedly a correct one.
While efforts are being made to strengthen the business aspect
of cultural activities, not every part of the cultural sector can,
or should, be commercialized.
A public sector should continue to exist in the cultural sphere.
This public sector covers libraries, public museums and protection
of cultural heritage, among others.
Libraries and public museums have been greatly under-financed in
many places around the country.
Now that financial resources for a big part of the cultural
sector will be diversified, the government can focus on supporting
public cultural services.
Particular attention should be given to small cities and the
countryside, where choices of cultural products and activities have
been very limited.
(China Daily January 14, 2006)